What went fallacious in Afghanistan
A decade earlier than the autumn of Kabul, I used to be deployed as a governance adviser to Brig. Gen. Scott Miller, who would quickly develop into Gen. Miller, the final US four-star commander to serve on the bottom in Afghanistan earlier than the Taliban swept the nation.
Had I been advised then that the Kabul authorities and the Afghan safety forces — the recipients of billions in US navy funding — would collapse so effortlessly in a mere 10 years, I might not have been stunned in any respect.
Lengthy after leaving authorities service, I contemplated what might have been accomplished in a different way, as I reported on the sequence of occasions that started in the summertime of 2021 with the Taliban seizing one provincial capital after one other.
From working within the Pentagon’s coverage store to deploying within the area as a civilian connected to US command workers, I had the distinctive perspective of observing and analyzing the struggle effort as an insider.
Now, as a media skilled dissecting the top of the Western navy mission, it’s clear to me that little might have been fairly accomplished to vary the tragic end result.
On July 8, 2021, US President Joe Biden stated that “our navy mission in Afghanistan will conclude on Aug. 31.” The Taliban have been on the gates of Kabul inside every week of Biden’s announcement.
A struggle that started out of the blue following the 9/11 terror assaults ended simply as shortly.
ALSO READ: The Afghanistan catastrophe film continues to roll, one 12 months after US withdrawal
The Taliban comeback was the results of elementary flaws in a US method that, over time, gave the impression to be much less a technique than a bureaucratic machine relying by itself momentum.
Unchecked Kabul authorities corruption fed by an enormous infusion of Western money, and a Taliban that mastered the artwork of insurgency led to 3 US administrations reaching out to the militants to barter.
However questions remained over whether or not the Taliban would finish their historic ties with worldwide terror, and whether or not the sudden US withdrawal can be seen as a serious victory for terrorists, who would use Afghanistan as a base to plot assaults overseas.
Evident indicators of the Afghan military’s lack of ability to combat the Taliban by itself had been ignored since a minimum of 2011, and the legal ineptitude of the Afghan authorities was allowed to fester regardless of warnings from each the intelligence neighborhood and navy advisers.
In Afghanistan, I used to be stationed within the northern command primarily based in Mazar-e-Sharif, the place the US was coming to the help of German, Nordic and different NATO forces who have been being overwhelmed by the Taliban’s alarming skill to exert management over key districts within the north.
In an indication of what was to return a decade later, the north on paper was speculated to be the realm least inclined to the Taliban’s shadow governance.
Nonetheless, it was on this area that the militants would make their first main positive factors in opposition to the Kabul authorities, earlier than finally descending on the capital in 2021.
Our mission in 2011 was to make sure the success of “village stability operations,” with a program supposed to “fill the gaps” the place the central authorities was unable to offer key providers in rural outlying districts.
It quickly grew to become obvious that “connecting” far-flung districts with the “middle” by intermittently rotating US navy models, USAID and State Division advisers was a quixotic mission at finest.
In the summertime of 2011, President Barack Obama gave a speech through which he set out the bold purpose that by 2014, the “strategy of transition can be full, and the Afghan individuals can be chargeable for their very own safety.”
However it was clear that exterior the Kabul “bubble,” Afghan safety forces have been in no form to deal with safety on their very own with out vital direct and oblique US navy help. This was as true in 2021 because it was in 2011, regardless of a succession of briefings to Congress by the US Division of Protection that painted a rosy image of the safety forces’ competency.
Ayman Al-Zawahiri’s elimination was a becoming coda to the top of America’s longest struggle.
Oubai Shahbandar
Afghan military district outposts have been always low on gasoline and ammunition, regardless of Kabul being allotted an abundance of those sources. Nonetheless, the “practice and equip” program was so large in scale that the navy command by no means took a severe have a look at the crimson flags concerning its effectiveness.
Along with the human toll that resulted from 20 years of rebel warfare and drone strikes, direct US navy assist price billions was both destroyed or captured by the Taliban.
Whereas most Afghan troops continued to combat bravely, widespread corruption within the protection and inside ministries, in addition to throughout the presidency, meant that troopers had no drawback reconsidering their loyalties relying on which facet they seen as being extra more likely to come out on prime.
In spite of everything, why combat for a Kabul authorities whose management was broadly perceived as abandoning broad swathes of the nation, even earlier than President Ashraf Ghani’s furtive flight into exile?
As provincial capitals started falling like dominoes, many Afghan troopers opted to put down their arms after they noticed their political leaders unwilling to threat their very own lives to defend their nation.
The US supplied Afghan safety forces with assist price $82.9 billion in whole. However ultimately, it didn’t matter. The Taliban entered most main cities in Afghanistan with barely a combat.
Gen. David Petraeus, former commander of US and NATO forces in Afghanistan, was keen on quoting his long-time diplomatic “wingman” Ryan Crocker, saying: “You will get uninterested in a film and go away the theater, however the film continues to roll on.”
Petraeus apprehensive that the removing of US forces didn’t essentially imply {that a} destabilized Afghanistan, or a Taliban regime in energy, would not pose a safety risk to the US and its allies.
In a way, he was proper.
Talks with the Taliban initiated by the Trump administration culminated in a February 2020 settlement, with either side agreeing to 2 predominant commitments: The withdrawal of all US and worldwide forces, and unspecified Taliban motion to forestall Al-Qaeda from utilizing Afghan soil to threaten the US and its allies.
However the Al-Qaeda connection was by no means absolutely severed.
The fear group’s former deputy Ayman Al-Zawahiri was eradicated by a US drone strike within the coronary heart of Kabul on Aug. 2, almost a 12 months after the Taliban took management of the nation.
Al-Zawahiri’s dying is seen by many analysts as vindicating the so-called “over the horizon” counterterror technique. It’s evident that high-value terror targets, corresponding to Al-Zawahiri, can nonetheless be tracked from the air and by probably property on the bottom — with out the pricey everlasting presence of troops.
So whereas the Taliban is more likely to have identified about and facilitated Al-Zawahiri’s motion into Kabul, it doesn’t appear preordained that transnational terrorists will be capable of freely roam and plot successfully in Afghanistan as they did within the late Nineties and early 2000s.
Whereas a small presence of US troops in all probability would have saved Kabul from falling, it might have accomplished little in the long term to forestall the Taliban from capturing all different main provinces.
ALSO READ: Inside Afghanistan’s secret colleges, the place women defy the Taliban
If the federal government couldn’t maintain locations like Mazar-e-Sharif or Kunduz within the north with out the return of US forces to these areas, there was little different choice than a near-permanent navy presence in Afghanistan to attempt to prop up a management that had been steadily dropping legitimacy for a while.
And that’s the operative phrase — legitimacy. Our makes an attempt, as properly intentioned as they have been, to one way or the other “convey” legitimacy to the Kabul authorities have been doomed from the beginning.
The relative safety caused by US-led applications corresponding to village stability operations, in addition to the arming and coaching of native forces, have been stopgap measures at finest.
Chaotic scenes at Kabul airport, and the sight of the white banner of the Taliban flying over former US bases shocked the American public final summer season.
However for analysts like me who had a granular view behind the proverbial curtain, navy trainers assigned to the Afghan military and advisers to Afghan ministries, the ending didn’t come as a shock.
The Taliban have been higher at constructing native allegiances with tribal elders and communities, in addition to offering providers. In lots of cases they have been benefiting from the seemingly infinite largesse that the US and Western donor international locations had been pumping into Afghanistan for thus lengthy.
Whereas Al-Zawahiri may need returned to Kabul feeling victorious, his elimination was a becoming coda to the top of America’s longest struggle.
Nonetheless, as Petraeus warned, leaving this explicit theater doesn’t imply that the movie is over.
Maybe the terrible conclusion to the struggle will supply policymakers priceless classes for the long run, in order that we don’t stumble unwittingly years from now right into a sequel, with the same plot, whereas hoping for a unique ending.
• Oubai Shahbandar is a former Division of Protection senior adviser, and at the moment a strategic communications advisor specializing in Center Jap and Gulf affairs.
Twitter: @OS26
Disclaimer: Views expressed by writers on this part are their very own and don’t essentially mirror Arab News’ perspective
