- Russia’s invasion of Ukraine has raised fears of direct battle between the US and Moscow.
- Advocates of extra aggressive US responses cite earlier navy encounters to minimize the dangers.
- However specialists warn that Russia’s involvement raises the stakes and {that a} conflict may rapidly escalate.
Russia’s invasion of Ukraine and Western efforts to resupply Ukraine’s navy and reinforce NATO’s japanese flank have raised considerations {that a} shut encounter or accident may escalate right into a broader conflict.
Proponents of elevated US help or of direct US involvement have performed down the chance or probably severity of a Russian response, however Russia has proven it is keen to strike close to NATO territory. Russian missiles hit a base close to Ukraine’s border with Poland on Sunday and an aircraft-repair facility in Lviv, additionally close to the border, on Friday.
“The Russians used missiles to hit targets which are very near the Polish border. A type of missiles hits Poland, President Biden has made very clear that it will be thought-about an assault on NATO, and then you definately do have a world conflict in your palms,” Leon Panetta, a former secretary of protection, mentioned this week at George Mason College occasion.
“I feel it is a harmful second,” Panetta mentioned, including that the danger is not “only a missile that goes astray. It is dangerous judgment. It is someone who makes a awful resolution.”
Consultants and former officers say the character of the battle, with uniformed troops from a nuclear-armed energy in fight close to NATO forces, imply even a restricted conflict carries extra threat.
Others argue a conflict with Russia would not essentially escalate, citing earlier encounters — together with the Battle of Khasham, an hours-long firefight between US-led and Russian-led forces in northeastern Syria.
‘These guys received lit up’
The conflict on February 7, 2018, was sparked by a pro-Assad regime power, together with mercenaries from Russia’s Wagner Group, advancing on an outpost manned by US particular operators and their Kurdish companions.
That evening, the pro-regime power opened hearth on the outpost with a mixture of tanks and enormous artillery and mortars, in keeping with paperwork seen by The New York Occasions. The US power on the outpost — made up of US Army Delta Power, Special Forces, and Rangers — took cowl and returned hearth with anti-tank missiles and machine weapons.
The US and Russia had used a de-confliction line to keep away from encounters as they operated in Syria, and US officers used it once more on the outset of the assault, asking Russian officers to cease the assault however with out success.
When Wagner personnel started to bracket the US place, firing artillery on both facet to pinpoint their intention, different US forces have been “cleared sizzling” and opened hearth, an official instructed Aaron Stein, director of analysis on the International Coverage Analysis Institute.
The strikes by US drones, fighter jets, bombers, gunships, assault helicopters, and artillery that adopted are believed to have killed 200 to 300 pro-regime fighters, together with many Russians. Russian jets have been within the air however have been held at bay by US plane, in keeping with Stein’s account.
“The Russian excessive command in Syria assured us it was not their folks,” then-Protection Secretary Jim Mattis instructed senators in April 2018. “My course to the Chairman [of the Joint Chiefs] was the power then was to be annihilated. And it was.”
Moscow has shut ties to Wagner Group and is Syrian chief Bashar al-Assad’s principal backer, but it surely selected to face apart at Khasham, Stein instructed Insider.
“The Russians claimed they weren’t theirs, and so these guys received lit up and lit up badly,” Stein mentioned.
The Soviets acted equally in Chilly Warfare conflicts, in keeping with Noel Maurer, a professor of worldwide affairs at George Washington College.
“Some pundits have averred that as a result of the Soviet Union despatched its pilots to have interaction with American air forces in 1951 Korea, then NATO can ship its pilots to have interaction in 2022 Ukraine,” Maurer mentioned Wednesday, pointing to a New York Occasions op-ed.
However throughout that conflict, Maurer added, Joseph Stalin “went out of his solution to plausibly deny Soviet involvement” and to sign a need to keep away from escalation “it doesn’t matter what.”
“For sure, Putin just isn’t sustaining discreet silence, claiming that solely proxies are invading Ukraine, or signaling a willingness to lose,” Maurer mentioned.
Requested about Khasham by Sen. Tom Cotton throughout a listening to this week, Gen. Kenneth McKenzie, head of US Central Command, mentioned it “tells you numerous” about US capabilities and confirmed that mercenaries would have “a qualitative drawback.”
“Additionally in the event that they’re combating towards a particularly decided folks which are digging their heels inside their homeland, just like the Ukrainian military, that perhaps we should not assume that they and even Russian regulars are 10 toes tall,” Cotton mentioned, drawing settlement from McKenzie.
Stein, who has researched and written concerning the air conflict over Syria and the Battle of Khasham, mentioned Russia’s response to an assault on its forces in Ukraine would differ from its response at Khasham.
“I feel the 2 points will not be comparable within the slightest bit,” Stein mentioned. “You probably have NATO forces come throughout that border, the Russians are going to do one thing. It could not essentially result in direct escalation straight away, but it surely’s not going to assist issues.”