This story was initially revealed by ProPublica.
This story consists of descriptions of sexual assault and bodily violence.
ProPublica is a nonprofit newsroom that investigates abuses of energy. Signal as much as obtain our largest tales as quickly as they’re revealed.
This text is co-published with The Texas Tribune, a nonprofit, nonpartisan native newsroom that informs and engages with Texans. Join The Temporary weekly to rise up to hurry on their important protection of Texas points.
When you or somebody has been sexually assaulted, you’ll be able to obtain confidential assist by calling the Rape, Abuse & Incest Nationwide Community’s 24/7 toll-free help line at 800-656-4673 or visiting its web site. You will be linked to a hotline employees member in your space or to the Division of Protection’s Secure Helpline.
Christian Alvarado started to kind as he sat alone in an interrogation room at Fort Bliss, a sprawling Army submit in El Paso, Texas. He’d spent a lot of the earlier seven hours hooked as much as a polygraph, answering a navy investigator’s questions on an allegation that he’d sexually assaulted a fellow soldier.
His story had modified a number of occasions in the course of the interview in late July 2020. The investigator instructed Alvarado he’d already failed two polygraph assessments, then left the room in order that the younger soldier may kind up his account in a sworn assertion. Together with his fingers on the keyboard, Alvarado started describing the evening in December 2019 that he spent within the barracks with a feminine soldier he’d met that day.
“She was drunk and so was I,” Alvarado, an Army non-public firstclass, typed on the investigator’s laptop. “We had intercourse, however she handed out.”
He wrote that he’d lied in regards to the encounter being consensual in earlier interviews with investigators as a result of he wished to guard his Army profession.
When Alvarado was carried out together with his written admission, the navy investigator walked again within the room. He requested Alvarado why he continued to have intercourse with the lady after she handed out. “I used to be within the second,” the 20-year-old soldier replied.
The investigator then requested Alvarado about one other allegation in opposition to him. An Army chaplain’s assistant had accused him of sexually assaulting her in Could 2020 after a home get together. Intercourse along with her was “mistaken because of how intoxicated she was,” Alvarado mentioned, however he wouldn’t comply with a sworn assertion in regards to the second allegation as a result of it might simply be “icing on the cake.”
Alvarado instructed the investigator that he’d had intercourse with 42 girls up to now 4 years, a couple of quarter of whom had been intoxicated on the time. His sexual experiences had develop into boring they usually blurred collectively, he mentioned, to the purpose that he struggled to recollect particular particulars about his companions.
On the finish of the daylong interrogation, Alvarado’s commanders didn’t place him in detention or below any restrictions past the orders he had already obtained to remain a minimum of 100 toes away from the 2 girls who had accused him of assault, in accordance with data. He was free to go away.
A month later, he sexually assaulted one other lady.
Had Alvarado’s case been dealt with by civilians and never the navy, his written admission may have been sufficient proof to rapidly challenge an arrest warrant, in accordance with two legal professionals who beforehand labored for the El Paso County district legal professional’s workplace.
“I’d have felt snug charging at that time,” mentioned Penny Hamilton, who led the Rape and Baby Abuse Unit on the district legal professional’s workplace and later served as an El Paso County Justice of the Peace decide. “When you may have the offender admitting the sexual act occurred and you’ve got the offender admitting that the alleged sufferer couldn’t have consented as a result of she was handed out, then you may have the weather” of a prison cost.
In Texas’ civilian system, an individual charged with sexual assault goes earlier than a Justice of the Peace decide, who’d set a bail quantity that specialists mentioned may simply be within the tens of 1000’s of {dollars}. Civilian magistrates and judges use bail to make sure suspects present up at trial. Suspects are launched provided that they will pay the bond.
The navy justice system has no bail. Many choices about who must be detained for severe crimes earlier than trial are made not by judges however by commanders, who usually are not required to be skilled legal professionals.
Latest congressional reforms modified the system, which has lengthy drawn criticism for the intensive discretion commanders wield. Whereas the revisions stripped a few of their authority, commanders proceed to manage varied points of the judicial course of, together with deciding whether or not service members accused of crimes must be detained whereas awaiting trial, a course of referred to as pretrial confinement.
A ProPublica and Texas Tribune investigation into how commanders within the Army, the nation’s largest navy department, use pretrial confinement revealed a system that treats troopers erratically and attracts little outdoors scrutiny. Over the approaching months, ProPublica and the Tribune will discover how navy justice operates, usually in vastly alternative ways than the civilian system.
The information organizations obtained knowledge from the Army on practically 8,400 courts-martial over the previous decade below the Freedom of Data Act. The ensuing evaluation, the first-of-its-kind, confirmed that troopers accused of sexual assault are lower than half as more likely to be positioned in pretrial confinement than these accused of offenses like drug use and distribution, disobeying an officer or housebreaking.
The evaluation confirmed that, on common, troopers needed to face a minimum of eight counts of sexual offenses earlier than they had been positioned in pretrial confinement as usually as troopers charged with drug or housebreaking crimes.
That disparity has grown up to now 5 years. The speed of pretrial confinement greater than doubled in circumstances involving drug offenses, larceny and disobeying a superior commissioned officer, nevertheless it remained roughly the identical for sexual assault circumstances like Alvarado’s, the evaluation discovered.
As an example, the Army opted in opposition to pretrial confinement for a employees sergeant who was accused of raping the spouse of a soldier in his command at Fort Bliss, whereas at one other submit a 19-year-old Texas lady was positioned in detention for greater than three months for utilizing medication and mouthing off to commanders.
“Justice that’s arbitrary shouldn’t be justice,” Col. Don Christensen, a former chief prosecutor for the Air Pressure, mentioned. “It shouldn’t come right down to the whims of a selected commander.”
Army officers defended the system. They mentioned that troopers accused of violent offenses aren’t essentially extra more likely to get pretrial confinement. “The character of the offense is one issue to contemplate in a choice to place somebody in pretrial confinement, however it’s not the only real issue,” mentioned Lt. Col. Brian Ok. Carr, chief of the operations department on the Workplace of the Decide Advocate Basic’s Prison Legislation Division, in an electronic mail. Traits of particular person troopers and their willingness to observe orders are additionally vital elements, Carr mentioned.
He mentioned that, below navy laws, commanders should first determine whether or not there’s good motive to consider {that a} soldier dedicated against the law and is both more likely to flee earlier than trial or interact in severe prison misconduct. Commanders have to contemplate if different restrictions, corresponding to directing troopers to stay in navy housing or requiring common check-ins with superiors, are enough to maintain them out of bother. They need to additionally weigh a soldier’s navy service report, character, psychological situation and any earlier misconduct.
In March 2020, months earlier than Alvarado was interviewed in regards to the sexual assault allegations, commanders reprimanded him after El Paso police arrested him for firing an AR-15 outdoors of his girlfriend’s residence. Alvarado instructed police on the time that he was making an attempt to scare off a pack of coyotes. An El Paso County warrant within the case stays excellent.
Regardless of the reprimand and the preliminary sexual assault allegations, former Fort Bliss spokesperson Lt. Col. Allie Scott mentioned that the circumstances to justify putting Alvarado in pretrial confinement weren’t met. Scott, who lately transferred to a different submit, declined to make clear. She mentioned Fort Bliss wouldn’t touch upon inside deliberations.
Practically a month after Alvarado walked out of the interrogation room at Fort Bliss, an Army captain decided there was possible trigger that he dedicated sexual assault, in accordance with data obtained by ProPublica and the Tribune. In a letter to the information organizations, Alvarado would later say he was harmless however declined to reply particular questions.
The Army’s resolution, and the failure to rapidly act on it, got here too late for Lee, a civilian and the third lady whom he would later be charged with sexually assaulting.
Lee, who agreed to go by her center identify for this story, nonetheless relives the second in late August when Alvarado assaulted her in her lounge. He pinned her down on her sofa and wrapped his hand round her throat whereas her two kids slept throughout the home.
She remembers calling a good friend and crying weeks later when she discovered from navy investigators that Alvarado had beforehand been accused of sexual assault.
“If one thing had been carried out sooner, he would have by no means gotten the prospect to harm me,” Lee mentioned.
A Justice System Led by Navy Commanders
The U.S. navy justice system dates again to the American Revolution. But the way in which wherein the system works and the way it diverges from the civilian authorized course of is unknown to many Individuals. (About 8% of adults within the U.S. presently serve or have served within the active-duty and reserve navy forces.)
The system was created to assist commanders maintain their preventing forces in line. So, in the beginning, courts dealt with solely military-specific offenses like desertion or dereliction of responsibility.
“George Washington wanted a method to self-discipline his troops,” mentioned Rachel E. VanLandingham, a professor at Southwestern Legislation College in Los Angeles and a former Air Pressure decide advocate, which is a navy legal professional. “It was very a lot a commander’s device.”
Bail was by no means a part of the navy system as a result of service members had been usually stationed in fortresses or distant, frontier garrisons, the place commanders managed their actions, mentioned Joshua Kastenberg, a professor on the College of New Mexico College of Legislation and former Air Pressure decide advocate.
Civilian crimes weren’t tried at court-martial till the American Civil Struggle, after which solely as a solution to prosecute Union troopers who had been accused of crimes in Accomplice states, Kastenberg mentioned.
For many years after, the navy may sort out civilian offenses solely throughout occasions of struggle.
Then the primary and second world wars uncovered a better variety of enlisted women and men to a justice system that was dramatically totally different from the civilian one. For instance, the folks representing them at trial weren’t required to be skilled legal professionals.
In an effort to carry the navy extra consistent with civilian court docket practices, Congress developed the Uniform Code of Navy Justice in 1950. This was a serious turning level, giving the navy — and, in flip, commanders — jurisdiction over civilian offenses like homicide and sexual assault, not simply throughout wars however in occasions of peace, Kastenberg mentioned.
Within the years since, the navy pushed again in opposition to limiting commanders’ management. Some navy authorized specialists interviewed by ProPublica and the Tribune keep pretrial confinement is superior to the civilian bail system as a result of a suspect’s freedom has nothing to do with their capability to pay. Prison justice specialists who oppose bail argue that it criminalizes poverty and penalizes folks of colour.
Critics of the navy justice system say giving commanders authority over who will get detained reinforces an ongoing drawback within the navy. Commanders are an accused individual’s supervisor and have little expertise or coaching to make consequential authorized choices.
Commanders “have satisfied themselves that they’ve some particular perception shared by no others that makes them solely certified to make prosecution choices and management the justice system,” mentioned Christensen, now president of the nonprofit Shield Our Defenders, a company that promotes navy justice reform.
The newest congressional push to defend the courts-martial course of from commanders’ affect adopted the 2020 homicide of Vanessa Guillén, an Army specialist who was sexually harassed by a supervisor after which allegedly killed by one other soldier at Fort Hood, Texas.
Guillén’s demise helped construct momentum for a long-standing effort by some lawmakers to dramatically scale back commanders’ function within the navy justice system. A invoice launched by U.S. Sen. Kirsten Gillibrand, a New York Democrat, proposed stripping commanders of the facility to determine whether or not to prosecute severe offenses and giving that authority to navy legal professionals.
The navy brass pushed again. To take away commanders “from prosecution choices, course of, and accountability might have an adversarial impact on readiness, mission accomplishment, good order and self-discipline, unit cohesion, belief, and loyalty between commanders and people they lead,” Gen. Mark A. Milley, the chair of the Joint Chiefs of Workers, wrote in a Could 2021 letter to Oklahoma Sen. James Inhofe, the highest Republican on the Armed Providers Committee.
In the long run, Congress authorised a compromise final yr that created a brand new workplace of navy attorneys with the facility to prosecute circumstances associated to some severe crimes corresponding to sexual assault, home violence, homicide and kidnapping.
Commanders retained prosecutorial management over different offenses, like theft, assault and distribution of managed substances.
Underneath the brand new legislation, commanders additionally held on to authority over different components of the judicial course of, together with pretrial confinement. They’ll seek the advice of navy attorneys with authorized questions, however they don’t seem to be required to observe that recommendation. And whereas a Justice of the Peace decide opinions circumstances wherein an individual is positioned in pretrial confinement, there is no such thing as a such evaluate when commanders choose in opposition to detaining troopers accused of crimes.
“A Harmful Particular person”
To know the way in which that commanders’ discretion works in observe, contemplate the case of Randall S. Hughes, a Fort Bliss Army employees sergeant who was accused of raping the spouse of one in every of his troopers at a Tremendous Bowl get together in 2017.
The girl instructed ProPublica and the Tribune she repeatedly requested that the Army place Hughes in pretrial confinement after it started an investigation. Hughes’ commanders didn’t. They finally determined in opposition to pursuing the case, citing proof and recommendation from navy counsel.
Hughes later moved to Joint Base McGuire-Dix-Lakehurst in New Jersey the place, in Could 2020, his 16-year-old daughter instructed navy investigators that he had sexually assaulted her two months earlier.
Once more, he was not detained.
Hughes’ commanders in New Jersey as an alternative directed him to reside on submit and required him to test in by telephone thrice a day.
Throughout the investigation into his daughter’s accusation, navy legislation enforcement found allegations that years earlier Hughes sexually assaulted one ex-wife and raped one other. The latter incident occurred whereas he was already below investigation for the rape at Fort Bliss. They discovered a 3rd ex-wife accused him of strangling her in 2015.
Hughes was once more not put into pretrial confinement.
Matt Leonard, an Army spokesperson, mentioned in an electronic mail that Hughes’ commanders “took applicable motion” to make sure the employees sergeant confirmed up at trial and did “not interact in additional severe misconduct.” Additionally they issued protecting orders for the victims.
In a March 2021 plea deal, Hughes admitted to plenty of expenses, together with raping the lady on the Tremendous Bowl get together and one in every of his ex-wives. He additionally was convicted of “squeezing” one other ex-wife’s neck together with his fingers. A decide sentenced him to virtually 14 years in jail and dishonorably discharged him. He didn’t plead responsible to sexually assaulting his daughter however admitted to utilizing indecent language along with her and pulling her by the hair.
Hughes’ legal professional didn’t reply to an electronic mail requesting remark.
Chayla Madsen, Hughes’ first ex-wife and the mom of the daughter who accused him of sexual assault, mentioned she agreed to the plea deal solely as a result of navy attorneys mentioned it might pace up the judicial course of and be higher for the victims.
Madsen used to consider the most secure place her daughter might be was on a navy base. Now she has no religion in a system that didn’t take severe authorized motion in opposition to Hughes in 2017 when he was first accused of sexual assault.
“They’d each motive to consider he’s a harmful individual,” Madsen mentioned.
Serial Offenses
Fort Bliss, the place Hughes was first accused of sexual assault, makes use of pretrial confinement considerably much less usually than the overwhelming majority of Army posts, making use of it at a charge of roughly 6% for circumstances with out sexual offenses and 5% for sexual assault circumstances, in accordance with the information organizations’ evaluation.
Simply as they’d carried out with Hughes, Fort Bliss commanders equally determined at varied junctures to not detain Alvarado.
They’d one other alternative two weeks after he assaulted Lee.
Navy investigators guided the 30-year-old mom, who had a quick relationship with Alvarado earlier than the assault, to contact him and see if he would acknowledge what occurred on the evening of Aug. 26, 2020, when he requested to return over to her home to speak.
Whereas sitting in a room with investigators, Lee texted Alvarado and requested him to clarify why he didn’t cease when she instructed him to.
He apologized.
After the admission, the Army ordered that Alvarado keep 100 toes away from Lee. He additionally had different restrictions, together with a requirement that he test in with commanders seven occasions a day in individual or by telephone, textual content or video name.
Scott, the Fort Bliss spokesperson, mentioned commanders decided Alvarado’s restrictions “primarily based on the knowledge accessible to them on the time.”
However six attorneys and navy legislation specialists expressed shock that commanders nonetheless didn’t order him into pretrial confinement.
“He’s below investigation for 2 sexual assaults, he’s been instructed to go away these folks alone after which we’ve got credible proof that he’s dedicated one other sexual assault,” mentioned Geoffrey S. Corn, a former Army officer and legislation professor. “That’s sufficient to show to me two issues: No. 1, he’s harmful and, No. 2, he is likely to be a flight threat as a result of he’s not getting the message he has to behave.”
One evening, virtually a month after the textual content alternate, Lee referred to as 911 when her 10-year-old son instructed her that Alvarado had tapped on his bed room window and mentioned hey, in accordance with a police report and an interview with Lee. Navy police arrived rapidly however couldn’t find anybody. Had Alvarado been there, he would have been in violation of the protecting order that required him to steer clear of Lee.
Scott mentioned neither Fort Bliss investigators nor Alvarado’s commanders knew of the declare as a result of navy police recordsdata didn’t point out his identify. Data obtained by ProPublica and the Tribune present that Lee shared Alvarado’s identify and the truth that she had a protecting order in opposition to him with a 911 dispatcher.
In late October, two months after Lee was assaulted, the Army formally charged Alvarado with three counts of sexual assault, in addition to with strangling Lee and mendacity to investigators. Nonetheless, he was not detained.
By the top of December, Alvarado was in bother once more.
He was arrested for driving drunk throughout a visit to Arizona, the place his household lives. Fort Bliss officers mentioned they weren’t conscious of the arrest as a result of neither Alvarado nor the Scottsdale Police Division notified the submit.
Alvarado then missed a number of required check-ins with commanders. Such failures may set off pretrial confinement. They didn’t. After a month of missed check-ins, Alvarado’s firm commander elevated how usually he needed to contact his superiors and required him to put in writing a 1,000-word essay on “the significance of Army leaders guaranteeing the security and well-being of their Troopers.”
“How lengthy do we have to let a serial predator proceed to violate orders and hurt folks?” mentioned Franklin Rosenblatt, a legislation professor who beforehand served as a Fort Bliss decide advocate from 2010 to 2012.
Totally different Therapy
Army officers say that pretrial confinement must be a final resort as a result of it detains troopers earlier than they’ve been convicted of against the law. However Pvt. Olivia Ochoa’s expertise exhibits how aggressive Army commanders will be even in circumstances with extra minor infractions.
A San Antonio native, Ochoa turned all for navy intelligence jobs after assembly a recruiter her senior yr of highschool. She joined the Army as a promising soldier in August 2020 shortly after graduating and was promoted in rank, in accordance with her recruiter.
The 19-year-old soldier quickly started to get in bother. Months into her Army profession, Ochoa was reprimanded for sexual harassment and making a hostile work surroundings after she and one other soldier had been accused of slapping one another’s butts, internal thighs and regularly flirting throughout formation in Fort Huachuca, Arizona.
The incident, which Ochoa denies, was the primary in a collection of run-ins along with her drill sergeants, starting from not carrying “the suitable quantity of water” in her water bottle to extra severe points like underage ingesting and consuming a THC edible.
“As soon as I knew I used to be gonna get in bother regardless of how a lot I attempted, I utterly stopped attempting,” Ochoa mentioned.
By Could 2021, one in every of Ochoa’s drill sergeants really useful that she be launched from the Army.
Whereas ready to be discharged, Ochoa mentioned, she was sexually assaulted by one other soldier at an off-post lodge. She initially anxious that if she filed a report, the navy would delay her launch, however after her psychological well being started deteriorating, she determined to report the assault.
In July, Ochoa was caught with psychedelic mushrooms and what investigators believed to be a vape pen with THC. The Army charged her with drug possession and use.
Her commander positioned her below restrictions that, amongst different issues, allowed her to go to solely the few buildings on submit the place she slept, ate and labored out.
Two days later, Ochoa obtained in bother for refusing her superiors’ order to return to mattress after she left her room to test on a good friend who was being positioned in confinement. That was sufficient for commanders to position her in pretrial confinement the subsequent day.
A navy Justice of the Peace ordered Ochoa’s launch a couple of week later, figuring out confinement was “not warranted” as a result of she had not damaged her restrictions.
Her freedom was short-lived.
Within the week following her launch, Ochoa’s commander once more positioned her in pretrial confinement after she was caught two days in a row at shops she had been barred from visiting, as soon as attempting to purchase cough medication she mentioned she deliberate to take to get excessive.
Though the Army’s case centered on drug use and possession, Ochoa was finally put in pretrial confinement each occasions for violating superior officers’ orders. Her commanders added seven new counts of disobeying and disrespecting superiors onto her drug case for causes that included refusing to return to her room and visiting the on-post shops.
Ochoa’s actions confirmed that she shouldn’t be within the Army, however her punishment was extreme, mentioned Rosenblatt, the legislation professor and former Army decide advocate. He mentioned her case is an instance of how pretrial confinement is utilized in “arbitrary” methods that may usually be fueled by a commander’s relationship with the soldier.
Commanders usually interpret drug use as jeopardizing the morale or security of the unit, whereas they have an inclination to view sexual assaults as a battle between two folks, mentioned Aniela Szymanski, a non-public legal professional and Marine Corps Reserve decide advocate.
“I believe that’s going to take a while for commanders to develop into having the identical knee-jerk response to sexual assault offenses as they do to drug offenses,” she mentioned.
Ochoa spent 103 days in pretrial confinement. She stopped consuming, barely slept and was shedding her hair and eyelashes.
In November, after her preliminary trial date was pushed again by two months, Ochoa accepted a plea deal. She was sentenced to time served. Throughout the listening to, Ochoa discovered Army officers had determined to not pursue her sexual assault case, figuring out that they might not set up possible trigger.
The choice was a shock to Ochoa and her civilian lawyer, Sean Timmons, who mentioned investigators didn’t interview key witnesses in regards to the assault. Army officers later agreed to talk with extra folks, however they got here to the identical conclusion and closed the case this yr.
“I consider if she was a soldier who they really preferred and wished to see have a productive profession, they most likely would have already taken steps to do that investigation correctly,” Timmons, a former navy legal professional, mentioned in an interview. “However as a result of they don’t like her, they’re going to maltreat her they usually’re going to do a half-assed job prosecuting him.”
A Fort Huachuca spokesperson mentioned the Army takes sexual assault allegations significantly and carried out an intensive and impartial investigation into Ochoa’s case.
“Damaged”
In March 2021, greater than seven months after Alvarado confessed throughout his interrogation, he was positioned in pretrial confinement.
By then, the allegations of sexual assault in opposition to him had drawn nationwide consideration. Asia Graham, the soldier who Alvarado acknowledged he sexually assaulted whereas she was unconscious, died at age 19 after by chance overdosing on medication. Earlier than her demise, Graham had written a letter to her mom, Nicole Graham, in regards to the ache she felt as a result of the Army had didn’t take motion in opposition to Alvarado.
The publicity round Graham’s case triggered two extra girls to return ahead in an interview with the cable information community NewsNation and accuse Alvarado of assaulting them years earlier in Arizona. The ladies had not beforehand reported the incidents.
Commanders’ repeated choices in opposition to pretrial confinement, which gave Alvarado the chance to assault Lee, didn’t draw public consideration. However Alvarado’s civilian protection legal professional final yr, Sherry Bunn, instructed ProPublica and the Tribune that she believed Army leaders had been merely reacting to “the press and publicity and the political nature” of Graham’s and Guillén’s deaths after they determined to restrict him. Army officers say he was put in pretrial confinement due to the extra allegations.
Nicole Graham mentioned her daughter may nonetheless be alive had commanders positioned Alvarado in detention earlier. That may have satisfied her daughter, who was haunted by the assault, that the Army was taking the case significantly, the mom mentioned.
“I believe she would have felt perhaps stronger in her restoration and never self-medicated,” she mentioned.
Nicole Graham obtained the prospect to face Alvarado on June 18, 2021, when a navy decide discovered him responsible of sexually assaulting her daughter and Lee, of strangling Lee and of mendacity to investigators. The decide acquitted him of all different expenses, together with the sexual assault of the chaplain’s assistant. After the decide’s ruling, Nicole Graham learn a press release from the stand about Asia: “The navy has let her down.”
The decide sentenced Alvarado to 18 years and three months in a navy jail and a dishonorable discharge from the Army. He obtained credit score for the time he spent in pretrial confinement forward of his trial: 108 days, 5 days greater than Ochoa.
Due to the dishonorable discharge and the size of his sentence, Alvarado’s case is below computerized enchantment. A call continues to be pending. He stays in custody.
The truth that Alvarado is behind bars offers Lee little consolation. The assault modified her.
She nonetheless has nightmares in regards to the presence of somebody in her residence, strolling up the steps to her bed room and beating on the door.
Life was not good earlier than the assault. She’d misplaced a being pregnant earlier than having her two kids. Two marriages to Army troopers ended. However she nonetheless had a life. She used to take pleasure in socializing, inviting associates over for recreation nights or going out round city.
Now, she stays residence more often than not.
She’s considered reducing her lengthy hair, as a result of attackers can seize you by the hair.
She now not likes to be touched, particularly on her face. Even her younger daughter loving on her can generally trigger her to panic.
“I’m just a little extra damaged than I was.”
Present Full Article
© Copyright 2022 ProPublica. All rights reserved. This materials will not be revealed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
