The opinions expressed on this op-ed are these of the writer and don’t essentially mirror the views of Army.com. If you want to submit your individual commentary, please ship your article to opinions@army.com for consideration.
The renaming of Fort Bragg, North Carolina, mandated by Congress and formalized in a ceremony in June, was a chance to remind not solely the set up’s present and future troops and households, but in addition the nation, of the social worth of our Army. In deciding on the identify “Liberty,” the Pentagon wasted a chance.
The shedding of the bottom’s Accomplice namesake was applicable and overdue and the Division of Protection must be lauded for its aggressive motion. The set up’s management had a chance to call the submit after a legendary determine from its grand heritage. The editorial board of the Fayetteville Observer, the each day native paper that has been masking Fort Bragg since its inception, advocated for “Fort Ridgway.”
Gen. Matthew Ridgway’s function within the desegregation of United Nations forces preventing in Korea, a transfer that was remarkably unpopular with troopers and generals throughout the Army, stays an underexamined second in American historical past. It was a daring transfer that had momentous ramifications for society at giant for many years to come back. The method shamed the Army into belatedly and begrudgingly performing on President Harry Truman’s army desegregation order of 1948. The ceremonial means of renaming one of many nation’s most celebrated bases may have introduced Ridgway’s brave resolution into present dialogue, even when only for a quick second.
Or selecting to go together with “Fort Porter,” in honor of Capt. James Porter, the unique commander of the all-black 555th Parachute Infantry Battalion, may have introduced nationwide consideration to the inspiring story of “the Triple Nickles.” The paratroopers of the Triple Nickles carried out so admirably of their wartime mission throughout World Conflict II that they have been built-in into all-white models on Fort Bragg one yr previous to Truman’s desegregation order.
In contrast, “Liberty” provides no such reflection. It’s a banal bromide that may imply just about something to anybody. It is lazy. It is secure. It treats our most fabled establishment as a mere commodity. It is the equal of naming the set up Fort Blue or Fort 1234567. The brand new identify was instantly and intensely unpopular with veterans and at present serving troopers. To keep away from offending anybody, the management disenchanted everybody.
Naming streets, faculties and army bases after historic figures is an endeavor soaked in threat: No determine in American historical past may be labeled as purely “good.” Not MLK, JFK, Lincoln, Washington. Not Eisenhower, Grant, Pershing.
No, we’re inward-seeking, difficult creatures; legacies are messy, notably when previous actions are weighed towards current social mores. With sufficient publicly out there info, all heroic figures come beneath criticism. That is true of Ridgway. It is also the explanation we should always honor the humanity, the moments of golden triumph and examples of compassion that women and men like him gave us.
“Liberty” is a dull, cold platitude — any set up in America may match the sobriquet. The House of the Airborne and Particular Operations, the set up established to type an American artillery drive for our first international conflict after which restructured within the Chilly Conflict by Lt. Gen. Ridgely Gaither as an experimentation heart for a rapid-deployment drive, deserves higher. It deserves a reputation commensurate with its historical past, lineage and legacy, a reputation befitting the troopers who’ve served there for many years and can serve there for many years to come back.
— Joe Buccino is a retired U.S. Army colonel, author and the director of Grave of Bulkington Media. He resides in Washington, D.C.
Story Continues
