By Dave Scanlon
Defence Watch Visitor Author
In poor health-timed particular forces surveillance coaching flights over the so-called Freedom Convoy protests in Ottawa in January and February uncovered persevering with issues with Canadian Armed Forces public communications. However the controversial flights provide extra important classes for high brass and their navy public affairs advisors.
First noticed by Ottawa-based open-source researcher Steffan Watkins, the unannounced flights had been carried out by Canada’s particular operations forces in a contracted U.S.-registered King Air surveillance plane. The particular forces have acquired three of a more recent mannequin with the primary to be delivered this summer time. Costing over $80 million every, the planes have high-tech electro-optical suites that may exactly observe and goal human actions on the bottom. The plane can intercept digital communications, together with cell telephones.
Since mid-2015, when then Chief of the Defence Workers, now retired, Gen. Jon Vance ordered the “operationalization” of navy public affairs, the armed forces have been beset with poor navy strategic communications. Most of the latest issues stem from a number of allegations of sexual misconduct—together with in opposition to Vance himself—and different misbehaviours, however there have been quite a few different self-inflicted points.
In 2020 alone, there have been 4 formal investigations into navy strategic communications missteps. There was additionally a overview of misguided plans to focus on Canadians with propaganda. Led by the navy’s Public Affairs Department, a five-year undertaking to create a proper navy strategic communications group—that included psychological operations workers—was abruptly shut down by Vance in November 2020. Chief of the Defence Workers Gen. Wayne Eyre after which Deputy Minister Jody Thomas later deemed the undertaking “incompatible” with federal coverage and missing in strategic-level path, steerage, and oversight.
Within the Web age—with its high-speed, inter-connected, world communications enabled by progressively stronger computer systems and smartphones—navy brass and their uniformed public affairs advisors have to be decidedly extra diligent in anticipating the publicity of navy actions, and the way these actions could also be perceived and even distorted. They have to additionally higher assess the potential dangers—such because the lack of public belief at house, or the destructive impression on operations abroad.
Some within the Canadian navy consider that data has develop into a sixth operational area, together with sea, land, air, area, and cyber. The foreword to a draft idea paper on Canadian Armed Forces data operations, attributed to now retired Lt.-Gen. Mike Rouleau, a former Vice Chief of the Defence Workers, asserted that, “we undertaking data into the surroundings whether or not we intend to or not,” subsequently the navy have to be extra deliberate in its use of data capabilities to attain navy goals.
Regardless of this outlook, and regardless of all the data already within the public area or discoverable by astute journalists and open-source researchers enabled by the Web, the Canadian navy took the measurable threat of covertly conducting particular forces aerial surveillance coaching flights over the risky Ottawa protests, in January and February.
The deliberate procurement of the King Air surveillance plane was well-known—it had been reported a number of instances by Ottawa Citizen defence reporter David Pugliese. In October 2018, he wrote that, “Canadian corporations had needed to supply the plane, however the Canadian navy determined it wanted the planes faster than they believed Canadian corporations might ship.”
Pugliese reported the three plane would “be outfitted with sensors and gear to intercept cellphone and different digital transmissions. Canadian particular forces and, probably, different authorities departments will use them for missions abroad and in Canada.” He additionally precisely reported the procurement was dealing with vital value overruns.
In a June 2019 replace, Pugliese added that three King Air surveillance plane had been anticipated to be delivered in 2022. He additionally wrote that Royal Canadian Air Pressure “pilots will fly the plane however members of the Canadian Particular Operations Forces Command will function the specialised gear within the planes.”
In a pertinent story, on Nov. 22, 2019, native CBC reporter Stu Mills reported that an RCMP Pilatus PC-12 spy aircraft was noticed flying over rural Ottawa by novice aircraft spotter John Clarke. “I’ve been monitoring planes my complete life,” stated Clarke. He picked up the plane’s transponder code with a $200 receiver and confirmed its six-digit serial quantity identifier by way of ADSBexchange, a web site that focuses on figuring out navy and VIP plane.
Mills reported the plane was a “Spectre” particular mission plane “geared up with an electro-optical turret able to capturing high-resolution video and photographs, in addition to intercepting radio and mobile communication.” The RCMP instructed the CBC that they had no details about the flight.
In September 2020, Globe and Mail senior parliamentary reporter Steve Chase reported that an RCAF CC-144 Challenger passenger plane had been noticed emitting a transponder code for a British plane—on at the least 80 flights since 2018. The blunder was seen by Watkins, the identical open-source researcher who noticed the King Air flights over the Ottawa protests.
The RCAF initially said Watkin’s declare was inconceivable, however after an inner investigation public affairs officer Lt.-Col. Adam Thompson acknowledged an “digital glitch” had resulted within the improper transponder code being broadcast. Mentioned Thompson about Watkin’s efforts: “On behalf of the RCAF management, we sincerely admire your educated curiosity on this and thanks for reaching out to us in order that we might rapidly repair this.”
Thompson additionally declared: “The RCAF doesn’t cover the identification of its plane and all the time respects civilian transportation procedures and rules in relation to the operation of navy plane in home civilian airspace.” A apply that Watkins later recommended was not adopted throughout the particular forces coaching flights. Alongside along with his personal electronics, Watkins screens web sites like ADSBexchange, RadarBox24, FlightAware, and Flightradar24.
This was the narrative already on the market within the data area. Nonetheless, when the story broke about navy surveillance flights over the Ottawa protests, Nationwide Defence was wholly unprepared.
The information was initially buried in a Globe and Mail article co-written by Chase and Ottawa bureau chief Bob Fife, printed on April 21, 2022. The article’s headline and lead focussed on the acquisition of the three spy planes, a $247 million deal “brokered by the U.S. authorities.” They wrote that the particular forces planes “are primarily supposed for offshore use and would solely be used to surveil Canadians domestically–in help of civilian authorities–with the approval of the federal cupboard.”
Down into the article, nonetheless, Chase and Fife famous Nationwide Defence “is declining to supply many particulars about exactly what a U.S.-registered plane, an earlier mannequin of the King Air, was doing Feb. 10 within the skies above Ottawa whereas town’s downtown was paralyzed by convoy protests.” Watkins—the researcher who had been beforehand thanked by the RCAF for his “educated curiosity”—had tweeted extensively on Feb. 10, 2022 about what seemed to be an American-registered “spook aircraft” working over Ottawa.
Regardless of Watkins’ lengthy document of precisely monitoring navy plane, Nationwide Defence didn’t instantly affirm that a number of flights over Ottawa in January and February had been linked to the armed forces. Solely after the Globe contacted a number of federal safety businesses did civilian Nationwide Defence spokesperson Dan Le Bouthillier admit they had been pre-planned navy coaching flights that “had nothing to do with the surveillance or the monitoring of actions.”
In a later Twitter thread, on Could 16, 2022, Watkins tweeted: “They turned off (or in any other case obfuscated) their transponder, whereas circling above a metropolis below siege, for hours. Arguably one of the eye-catching suspicious issues they may have finished lately…. They thought they’d be invisible, however by being invisible, they had been outstanding.”
Per week after the Globe story, on Could 3, 2022 Pugliese reported the coaching flights had been linked to Canadian particular forces, which was belatedly acknowledged by Nationwide Defence. The following day, Chase reported that, “Prime Minister Justin Trudeau says a surveillance aircraft circling Canada’s capital throughout the convoy protests was merely a navy coaching operation and was not spying on these blockading Ottawa’s downtown core.”
That the prime minister was now taking provocative questions from opposition MPs little question resulted in some inner rebukes directed at Nationwide Defence. Le Bouthillier instructed the Globe: “Cancelling such coaching would have been pricey and would have had a destructive impression on sustaining required certifications and {qualifications}, and thus on Canadian Armed Forces operational readiness.”
Lastly, on Could 16, 2022 Pugliese uncovered seemingly contradictory statements by Nationwide Defence when he reported {that a} navy directive issued on Jan. 27, 2022—on the outset of the Ottawa protests—said that, “Canadian Forces autos and personnel had been to keep away from the Ottawa protest and Royal Canadian Air Pressure planes had been to not fly over the “Freedom Convoy” demonstration.”
The reason supplied to Pugliese by Le Bouthillier was that, “amplifications offered by the RCAF by way of this directive didn’t apply to those coaching actions, which had been contracted exterior of the RCAF.” This regardless of the actual fact RCAF pilots could be flying the soon-to-arrive new surveillance plane, and particular operations personnel could be working the delicate onboard gear.
Nobody from Nationwide Defence defined why it was essential to conduct the coaching flights instantly over one of the contentious and protracted protests in Canadian historical past—at instances with the situation transponder presumably switched off. Nor did anybody moderately clarify why such navy exercise was carried out regardless of the prime minister’s declarations or the navy’s directive for navy personnel, autos, and plane to keep away from the protests.
Even when the coaching flights had been carried out elsewhere over an city space, navy brass and their public affairs advisors ought to have been asking themselves if there have been different strategic communications dangers. Outdoors observers may ask, for instance, if the flight was monitoring the actions of Canadian residents to check and certify particular forces personnel and gear?
Related questions had been raised in July 2020 throughout Operation Laser, which was the navy’s contingency plan activated in response to the coronavirus pandemic that included armed forces help to long-term care services in Quebec and Ontario. In mid-pandemic, amongst different missteps, it was reported by Pugliese that service members working for navy intelligence had been monitoring the social media posts of Canadian residents.
When he realized of this, then Minister of Nationwide Defence Harjit Sajjan ordered a overview of the questionable intelligence assortment actions—one of many 4 formal investigations famous above. The investigation concluded that the intelligence-led groups broke the principles “by not conducting a threat evaluation previous to conducting actions on the web” and by accumulating knowledge about Canadian residents with out increased path.
Even when, ostensibly, they had been coaching flights, observers may ask if the surveillance capabilities had been tacitly supplied to the RCMP as they and different legislation enforcement businesses grappled with the protests—or if navy help had been requested? They may ask if navy personnel, autos, and gear had been on the bottom in downtown Ottawa to emulate targets? Or, was any of this accepted by increased authorities? On Could 6, 2022, Watkins tweeted: “If it wasn’t the convoy, who was the goal?”
Within the Web age, tactical or operational choices, and even private decisions, can have enduring strategic penalties within the data area. Take into account the tactical if not commonsense failure to put car barricades in downtown Ottawa previous to the Freedom Convey protests. The ensuing chaos dominated the headlines and social media for months and impressed different disruptive protests nationally and internationally. Like their legislation enforcement counterparts, navy decision-makers have to be extra strategically minded in in the present day’s data area.
Recognizing this, NATO has made strategic communications a precedence, particularly after Russia’s first invasion of Ukraine in 2014, the place it waged aggressive Web-enabled data warfare. Outlined by NATO because the “coordinated and applicable use of … communications actions and capabilities,” strategic communications contains instruments like public affairs—applicable for all audiences—and knowledge, psychological, and deception operations—applicable for outlined adversaries. NATO coverage knowledgeable the Canadian navy’s efforts, however there was an egregious failure to heed the important notion of “applicable use.”
Regardless of previous missteps, constructing knowledgeable navy strategic communications functionality—aligned with whole-of-government and Allied efforts—stays important if Canada’s armed forces are going to speak and function successfully within the Web age. However this have to be finished ethically, with the proper authorities, impartial oversight, and frank enter from exterior specialists and critics—enter that was often ignored by proponents of the shuttered undertaking to operationalize public affairs.
To construct important capability, navy public affairs specifically have to be routinely plied and honed in the true world. Certainly, all authorities public communications have to be higher exercised—and fewer centrally managed—to be efficient. The tendency at Nationwide Defence to make use of a civilian spokesperson and centrally massaged media strains permits the armed forces to keep away from public accountability whereas denying wanted expertise to navy public affairs officers and others who must advise commanders on operations in an more and more advanced data area.
The delicate King Air surveillance plane itself epitomizes the very problem of the Web age—there’s virtually nowhere to cover. Navy brass are lucky the spy aircraft story performed out in a peace-time, home context—in the event you can’t get it proper at house, it doesn’t bode effectively for advanced operations abroad.
Getting it proper at house would require a brand new strategic mindset dedicated to truthfulness and transparency, the “applicable use” of public communications, and a dedication to rebuilding eroded public belief in a valued nationwide establishment shaken by typically self-inflicted communications missteps.
The management of the Canadian Armed Forces can and should do higher within the 21
st
-century data area to earn and retain the belief of Canadians, whereas ethically creating the data capabilities wanted to guard Canadian values and pursuits at house and overseas.
(
Retired navy captain Dave Scanlon is a former senior navy public affairs officer. Throughout his 30-year profession within the Canadian Armed Forces, he suggested in any respect ranges of command in Canada, served in each of NATO’s strategic instructions, and served as a NATO spokesperson in Bosnia and communications advisor in Afghanistan. He’s additionally a graduate of the US Protection Info College and the NATO Protection Faculty.)
Copyright Postmedia Community Inc., 2022
