The commander of a Navy destroyer who refused the COVID-19 vaccine and sued the service has been faraway from command, in accordance with a courtroom submitting in his case.
“On Monday, April 11, as an alternative of getting underway together with his ship, Navy Commander was ‘quickly reassigned’ for 60 days beneath a brand new Navy coverage that prohibits unvaccinated personnel from going underway on Navy ships,” a declaration from the officer’s lawyer reported to the courtroom.
The commander, together with greater than 30 unnamed officers and enlisted personnel from all of the army branches, sued the army over the vaccine mandate in November 2021 in a federal courtroom in Florida. Since then his case, together with one filed by Navy SEALs in Texas, touched off a authorized debate about how a lot energy the army has to implement the vaccine mandate and the character of the spiritual exemption course of.
Learn Subsequent: Land Navigation Is Coming Again to the Army’s Primary Chief Course
Choose Steve Merryday, who’s presiding over the commander’s case, dominated in early February that, for the sake of “preservation of the established order” whereas the go well with is being determined, the Navy was barred from reassigning or demoting the commander. A second order, reaffirming and lengthening the time period of the injunction, adopted Feb. 18.
The order set off a collection of filings from the service that argued the order forcing it to maintain an officer who refused to take the vaccine in a spot of command “indefinitely sidelines a Navy warship.”
Nonetheless, on March 25, the Supreme Courtroom dominated that the Navy is allowed to make its personal selections about whether or not to deploy sailors who refuse the coronavirus vaccine. On March 30, “following the Supreme Courtroom’s lead,” the Courtroom of Appeals for the eleventh Circuit stayed Merryday’s injunction.
Since that point, neither the Navy nor the Justice Division, which has been dealing with the messaging for the case, would say if the commander had, in truth, been reassigned.
Authorized filings say the officer, who shouldn’t be recognized within the lawsuit, joined the Navy in 2004 and now has “almost 18 years within the service.” Different paperwork filed by the Navy present that the destroyer he commanded relies in Norfolk, Virginia, and belongs to Destroyer Squadron 26.
In response to the grievance, the commander filed a spiritual lodging request in September 2021 however was denied a month later; he appealed in November. The Navy tried to take away the person from the publish however, in accordance with courtroom paperwork, it wasn’t over the lodging request or his refusal to get the vaccine.
The commanding officer’s boss — Capt. Frank Brandon — instructed the courtroom that the Navy’s objection to conserving the skipper in place was over his disregard for insurance policies designed to guard his personal crew.
Brandon testified to 2 incidents that made him lose religion within the commander’s skill to guide the destroyer.
The primary incident occurred in early November when, in accordance with Brandon, the commander gave a briefing to “roughly 50-60 personnel … in shoulder-to-shoulder proximity,” even if “he might barely communicate.” When Brandon questioned the commander in his cabin, the person conceded that he had a sore throat however blamed it on a jog within the chilly air. The unvaccinated commander was ordered to get a COVID-19 check, which got here again constructive.
The second incident occurred three months later in early February 2022. In response to Brandon, the commander instructed him he wanted to take depart however failed to inform his boss that he was leaving the Norfolk space “with a purpose to testify on this litigation.” This was not solely a breach of Navy journey coverage amid the pandemic however a breach of belief as effectively, he mentioned.
“My lack of confidence in [the ship’s commander] shouldn’t be based mostly on his vaccination standing or his denied request for a spiritual exemption,” Brandon wrote within the submitting. “It’s based mostly on the truth that I can not belief his judgment, I can not belief him to take care of the welfare of his sailors, and I can not belief him to be sincere with me.”
A service coverage, revealed in November 2021, notes that “Navy service members who usually are not vaccinated, no matter exemption standing, could also be quickly reassigned with concurrence of the primary flag officer within the administrative chain of command based mostly on operational readiness and mission necessities.”
— Konstantin Toropin will be reached at konstantin.toropin@army.com. Comply with him on Twitter @ktoropin.
Associated: Navy Halts Discharges of Sailors with COVID-19 Non secular Exemption Requests
© Copyright 2022 Navy.com. All rights reserved. This materials might not be revealed, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
