January 6, 8:45 pm ET
Click on right here to see ISW’s interactive map of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. This map is up to date each day alongside the static maps current on this report.
Russian officers and milbloggers largely didn’t react to the US announcement of greater than $3.75 billion in new navy help to Ukraine, additional highlighting that the Kremlin and the Russian info area selectively select when to painting Western navy help as an escalation. US Secretary of State Antony Blinken introduced on January 6 that the help would offer Ukraine with Bradley infantry preventing autos, artillery techniques, armored personnel carriers, surface-to-air missiles, and ammunition.[1] Russian officers and milbloggers scarcely reacted to the most recent announcement of navy help, although the Kremlin most not too long ago portrayed the switch of purely defensive Patriot air protection techniques to Ukraine as an escalation.[2]
The shortage of Russian response to the US announcement of navy help that Ukrainian forces might use to help counteroffensive operations helps ISW’s earlier evaluation that the Kremlin is extra involved with its info operations and the impact that Western navy assist can have on particular Russian navy operations in Ukraine than with any explicit weapons techniques, crimson strains, or the supposed Russian fears of putative Ukrainian offensive actions in opposition to the Russian Federation itself utilizing Western techniques.[3] The Kremlin selectively responds to Western navy shipments and help to Ukraine to help info operations that intention to border Ukraine as missing sovereignty and to weaken Western willingness to supply additional navy help by stoking fears of Russian escalation.[4] The Kremlin and the Russian info area will possible seize upon future Western navy assist that they consider can help these info operations quite than as a mirrored image of any precise Kremin crimson strains or particular issues in regards to the potential menace Western weapons techniques could pose. ISW has beforehand famous that these observations are price contemplating within the context of the Western dialogue of offering Ukraine with Western tanks, long-range assault techniques, and different capabilities.
Russian officers and milbloggers continued to reply negatively to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s January 5 ceasefire announcement as hostilities continued in Ukraine on January 6. Donetsk Individuals’s Republic (DNR) Head Denis Pushilin remarked {that a} ceasefire doesn’t imply that Russian troops will cease responding to “provocations by Ukrainian troops,” or else Russian forces run the chance of affording Ukraine the chance to enhance their positions in essential areas of the entrance.[5] Pushilin’s assertion was an implicit criticism of the ceasefire announcement and exemplifies the truth that the announcement was poorly obtained by Russian navy leaders. Former commander of militants in Donbas in 2014 and outstanding milblogger Igor Girkin known as the ceasefire “a daring and decisive step in the direction of defeat and give up” for Russian forces and criticized Russian management for failing to study from the outcomes of earlier ceasefires over the past eight years.[6] Different outstanding milbloggers seized on the ceasefire announcement to criticize the Kremlin’s conduct of the warfare and accuse Russian management of immediately inserting Russian troopers in hurt’s method.[7] The ceasefire announcement will possible proceed to function a degree of neuralgia for voices within the info area which have traditionally loved a mutually reinforcing relationship with Putin.
Whereas many voices within the Russian info area strongly criticized the ceasefire announcement, sure hardline components seized on Putin’s assertion to proceed to propagate the narrative that Putin is a protector of non secular values and morals. Deputy Chairman of the Russian Federation Safety Council Dmitry Medvedev acknowledged on January 6 that Putin provided “the hand to Christian mercy” to Ukraine and that Ukraine rejected it as a result of Ukraine lacks religion.[8] Commander of the Chechen Akhmat Special Forces, Apti Alaudinov, responded to the ceasefire with glowing reward for Putin, whom he known as a “true believing Christian,” famous that Jesus is a revered prophet in Islam, and accused Ukrainian “Satanism” of being the explanation why Kyiv refused to simply accept the truce.[9] Alaudinov‘s reward of the ceasefire on spiritual grounds is a part of a selected and long-running Kremlin info operation that seeks to cater to numerous spiritual minority teams within the Russian Armed Forces by framing Ukraine as an immoral enemy whose lack of religion transcends offends Christians and Muslims alike.[10]
Distinguished Russian milbloggers continued to make use of their platforms to advocate for the eradication of Ukrainian cultural and ethnic identification. Donetsk Individuals’s Republic (DNR) commander Alexander Khodakovsky claimed on January 6 that Russia and Ukraine share a “frequent gene pool” and “religious area” that Ukraine is destroying because the warfare continues.[11] Khodakovsky’s assertion is a transparent rejection of the Ukrainian individuals as sovereign and distinct from Russia. Equally, one other outstanding milblogger claimed that the thought of a Ukrainian ethnicity has by no means existed and was manufactured by Ukrainian “nationalists.”[12] The milblogger invoked the idea of “Malorossiya”- the imperial Russian ideation of Ukrainian territory as totally a part of and subordinate to Russia.[13] One other Russian warfare correspondent amplified the pre-February 24 fiction that Ukraine is oppressing Russian audio system and claimed that the warfare should proceed as a way to restore the Russian language to the “territory of the soon-to-be-former Ukraine.”[14] These outstanding and broadly adopted voices within the Russian info area proceed to brazenly advocate for the dehumanization and destruction of the Ukrainian individuals. As long as the Kremlin continues to supply area for such voices because it ruthlessly censors views that stray from its personal info strains, the intent behind Putin’s warfare stays clear.
Key Takeaways
- Russian officers and milbloggers largely didn’t react to the US announcement of greater than $3.75 billion in new navy help to Ukraine.
- Russian officers and milbloggers continued to reply negatively to Russian President Vladimir Putin’s January 5 ceasefire announcement as hostilities continued in Ukraine on January 6.
- Sure hardline components of the Russian info area seized on Putin’s assertion to propagate the narrative that Putin is a protector of non secular values.
- Distinguished Russian milbloggers proceed to make use of their platforms to advocate for the eradication of Ukrainian cultural and ethnic identification.
- Russian and Ukrainian forces continued offensive operations close to Kreminna and Svatove.
- Russian sources claimed that Russian forces made good points in Soledar as Russian offensive operations continued round Bakhmut and the Avdiivka-Donetsk Metropolis space.
- Russian authorities and navy leaders proceed to face backlash for his or her responses to the December 31 Ukrainian strike on a Russian base in Makiivka, Donetsk Oblast.
- Russian forces and occupation authorities are persevering with to focus on Ukrainian youngsters to consolidate social management in occupied territories.
We don’t report intimately on Russian warfare crimes as a result of these actions are well-covered in Western media and don’t immediately have an effect on the navy operations we’re assessing and forecasting. We’ll proceed to guage and report on the results of those prison actions on the Ukrainian navy and inhabitants and particularly on fight in Ukrainian city areas. We totally condemn these Russian violations of the legal guidelines of armed battle, Geneva Conventions, and humanity although we don’t describe them in these studies.
- Ukrainian Counteroffensives—Jap Ukraine
- Russian Fundamental Effort—Jap Ukraine (comprised of 1 subordinate and one supporting effort);
- Russian Subordinate Fundamental Effort—Seize the whole lot of Donetsk Oblast
- Russian Supporting Effort—Southern Axis
- Russian Mobilization and Pressure Era Efforts
- Actions in Russian-occupied Areas
Ukrainian Counteroffensives (Ukrainian efforts to liberate Russian-occupied territories)
Jap Ukraine: (Jap Kharkiv Oblast-Western Luhansk Oblast)
Russian and Ukrainian forces continued offensive operations close to Svatove on January 6. The Ukrainian Common Workers reported that Russian troops performed a restricted floor assault close to Stelmakhivka (15km northwest of Svatove).[15] A Russian milblogger claimed that each Russian and Ukrainian troops are conducting positional battles within the Svatove path and that Ukrainian troops unsuccessfully attacked Russian positions close to Kuzemivka (13km northwest of Svatove).[16] Russian milbloggers additionally indicated that components of the Western Navy District—notably the twenty seventh Separate Motorized Rifle Brigade of the first Guards Tank Army and third Motor Rifle Division of the twentieth Mixed Arms Army—are lively close to Svatove.[17]
Russian and Ukrainian forces continued offensive operations close to Kreminna on January 6. The Ukrainian Common Workers acknowledged that Ukrainian troops repelled Russian assaults close to Makiivka (22km northwest of Kreminna) and Ploshchanka (16km northwest of Kreminna).[18] A Russian milblogger indicated that components of the 752nd Guards Motor Rifle Regiment of the third Motor Rifle Division of the twentieth Mixed Arms Army are preventing close to Makiivka.[19] One other Russian milblogger claimed that Ukrainian forces tried a number of unsuccessful counterattacks to regain misplaced positions alongside the Balka Zhuravka River that runs between Ploshchanka and Kreminna.[20] The Russian Ministry of Protection (MoD) claimed that Ukrainian sabotage and reconnaissance teams are lively southwest of Kreminna between Serebrianka and Hryhorivka.[21] Russian sources continued to assert that Russian forces are preventing for Bilohorivka (10km south of Kreminna).[22]
Russian Fundamental Effort—Jap Ukraine
Russian Subordinate Fundamental Effort—Donetsk Oblast (Russian goal: Seize the whole lot of Donetsk Oblast, the claimed territory of Russia’s proxies in Donbas)
Russian sources claimed that Russian forces made good points in Soledar on January 6. A number of milbloggers reported that Wagner Group forces stormed Bakhmutske (10km northeast of Bakhmut and simply south of Soledar) on the evening of January 5 to six and broke by means of to the middle of Soledar.[23] One milblogger posted footage of a Wagner Group fighter reportedly within the heart of Soledar, though the fighter says that it’s too early to say that they’ve captured Soledar totally.[24] One milblogger claimed that Russian troops superior so far as Krasnopillia, 4km northwest of Soledar, and that the Ukrainian grouping in Bakhmut is beneath menace of encirclement consequently.[25] ISW has not but noticed visible info that corroborates these Russian claims. Wagner Group financier Yevgeny Prigozhin notably emphasised that solely Wagner troops are answerable for these claimed good points, however that dialogue of the entire seize of Soledar is untimely.[26] Prigozhin continues to place himself and Wagner Group forces as the only real actors answerable for good points within the Bakhmut space, as ISW has beforehand famous.[27]
Ukrainian troops continued to defend positions northeast and south of Bakhmut on January 6. The Ukrainian Common Workers reported that Ukrainian troops repelled Russian assaults on Bakhmut itself; northeast of Bakhmut close to Spirne (30km northeast), Soledar, Krasna Hora (5km north); and south of Bakhmut close to Klishchiivka (7km southwest) and Kurdyumivka (13km southwest).[28] The Ukrainian State Border Guards Service emphasised that Ukrainian forces neutralized a Russian grenade launch level within the Bakhmut path to stop preparations for an additional Russian counterattack within the space.[29] Russian milbloggers continued to debate preventing to the south and northeast of Bakhmut.[30]
Russian forces continued offensive operations alongside the western outskirts of Donetsk Metropolis on January 6. The Ukrainian Common Workers acknowledged that Russian troops attacked close to Pervomaiske (on the northwestern outskirts of Donetsk Metropolis) and Marinka and Pobieda (on the southwestern outskirts of Donetsk Metropolis).[31] A Russian milblogger additionally reported preventing northwest of Donetsk Metropolis close to Nevelske and southwest of Donetsk Metropolis close to Novomykhailivka.[32] The Donetsk Individuals’s Republic (DNR) Individuals’s Militia posted graphic video footage reportedly of the aftermath of an assault by the DNR fifth Brigade on a Ukrainian grouping in Marinka.[33] Milbloggers amplified the footage to spotlight the depth of operations in Marinka.[34]
Russian forces didn’t conduct any claimed or confirmed floor assaults in western Donetsk or jap Zaporizhia oblasts on January 6 and continued routine shelling alongside the road of contact on this space.[35] The Russian Ministry of Protection (MoD) highlighted the usage of thermobaric artillery techniques in western Donetsk Oblast, indicating that Russian forces could also be using this navy district-level asset to prioritize operations on this space.[36]
Supporting Effort—Southern Axis (Russian goal: Keep frontline positions and safe rear areas in opposition to Ukrainian strikes)
Russian sources claimed that Ukrainian forces performed operations on the Kinburn Spit in Mykolaiv Oblast and maintain positions on an island within the Dnipro River in Kherson Oblast on January 6. A Russian milblogger claimed that Ukrainian forces are at the moment conducting reconnaissance actions within the space of the Kinburn Spit.[37] One other Russian milblogger amplified footage on January 6 reportedly of Russian Spetsnaz models firing on Ukrainian positions on Velyki Potemkin Island southwest of Kherson Metropolis within the Dnipro River delta.[38] Russian sources claimed that Russian forces keep positions on the island on January 5.[39] Russian sources used footage posted on January 5 to assert that Russian forces captured the island, however later geolocation of the footage exhibits that Russian forces have been truly working south of Velyki Potemkin Island on the best financial institution of the Konka River close to Kardashynka, Kherson Oblast (9km south of Kherson Metropolis).[40]
Ukrainian forces proceed to strike Russian positions in rear areas of southern Ukraine. The Ukrainian Common Workers reported that Ukrainian forces struck Russian forces in Havrylivka Druha, Kherson Oblast on January 5, critically injuring 100 Russian servicemembers.[41] Russian milbloggers claimed on January 6 that Ukrainian forces shelled Oleshky and Kakhovka in Kherson Oblast in addition to Tokmak and Dorozhnianka in Zaporizhia Obalst.[42] A Kherson Oblast Telegram channel amplified native studies on January 6 that residents heard explosions within the neighborhood of Radensk, Kherson Oblast.[43] Ukrainian Berdyansk Head Viktoria Halitsyna reported on January 6 that residents heard 11 explosions in Berdyansk, Zaporizhia Oblast.[44]
Russian forces continued routine artillery strikes west of Hulyaipole, on the best financial institution of the Dnipro River in Dnipropetrovsk and Kherson oblasts, and in Mykolaiv Oblast.[45] Ukrainian sources reported that Russian forces struck Kherson Metropolis, Beryslav, Nikopol, and Ochakiv.[46]
Mobilization and Pressure Era Efforts (Russian goal: Develop fight energy with out conducting normal mobilization)
Russian authorities and navy leaders proceed to face backlash for his or her responses to the December 31 Ukrainian strike on a Russian base in Makiivka, Donetsk Oblast. Samara Oblast residents wrote a petition demanding that Russian authorities publish the checklist of the service members killed within the strike, after Samara Oblast Governor Dmitry Azarov confirmed on January 2 that mobilized personnel from Samara Oblast died within the strike.[47] A mobilized Russian servicemember who survived the strike in Makiivka posted a video on January 3 wherein he argues that the commanders of the Russian battalion and regiment concerned within the strike are answerable for the incident.[48] ISW assesses that the Russian info area continues to grab upon the Ukrainian strike in Makiivka to criticize endemic points within the Russian navy equipment.[49]
Official Ukrainian sources proceed to report that Russian forces and occupation officers are getting ready for an additional wave of mobilization in occupied Ukrainian territories. The Ukrainian Common Workers reported on January 6 that occupation workers of navy recruitment places of work in Donetsk Metropolis began gathering details about residents who’re 17 years previous for navy registration on January 1.[50] The Ukrainian Resistance Heart reported on January 6 that Russian forces are taking physique armor away from occupation civil servants to supply the armor to personnel mobilized within the subsequent wave.[51] The Resistance Heart reported that Russian occupation navy recruitment places of work in Horlivka, Donetsk Oblast offered a plan to mobilize 2,000 residents from the town and that Russian forces have elevated patrols within the metropolis to stop residents from evading the brand new wave of mobilization.[52]
Chechen Republic Head Ramzan Kadyrov continues to broaden his parallel navy constructions. Kadyrov claimed on January 6 that over 9,000 fighters have educated on the Special Forces (Spetsnaz) College in Gudermes, Chechnya.[53] The power provides a two-week accelerated tactical coaching course to volunteers who later deploy to Ukraine alongside Russian forces.[54] It’s unclear in what capability and with what Russian navy formations volunteer graduates of the ability are at the moment serving in Ukraine. ISW assesses that Kadyrov routinely promotes his efforts to create Chechen-based parallel navy constructions to curry favor with Russian President Vladimir Putin and broaden his political and navy affect.[55]
Russian navy volunteer formations are reportedly combating accessing provisions and tools. A BARS-13 (Russian Fight Reserve) affiliated supply acknowledged on January 5 that the BARS-14 Battalion fashioned of BARS-13 volunteers wants monetary help to amass winter uniforms, turbines, gasoline stoves, and different primary provides.[56] The BARS-13 affiliated supply claimed that the BARS-14 Battalion is at the moment serving in a tough sector of the Svatove entrance in Luhansk Oblast.[57] The Russian Navy launched the initiative to create Russian Fight Army Reserves within the fall of 2021 and aimed to recruit 100,000 volunteers, however largely failed to take action previous to the invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.[58] These BARS formations have not too long ago been lively in Luhansk Oblast alongside the Svatove-Kreminna line.[59]
Tensions between parastatal and traditional Russian forces in Ukraine could also be growing. The Ukrainian Resistance Heart reported on January 6 that typical Russian mobilized personnel are more and more upset that Wagner Group personnel and Chechen forces have precedence in lodging and in receiving ammunition and different navy tools.[60] ISW beforehand assessed that the Russian navy’s reliance on each typical and parastatal forces such because the Wagner Group and Chechen models will possible proceed to break fight functionality.[61] Heightened tensions between these typical and parastatal forces would possible additional degrade Russian forces’ fight capabilities in Ukraine.
Exercise in Russian-occupied Areas (Russian goal: consolidate administrative management of and annexed areas; forcibly combine Ukrainian civilians into Russian sociocultural, financial, navy, and governance techniques)
Russian forces and occupation authorities are persevering with to focus on Ukrainian youngsters to consolidate social management of occupied territories. The Ukrainian Resistance Heart reported on January 6 that Russian forces are taking Ukrainian youngsters to Moscow, Rostov, and different giant Russian cities en masse to rejoice the New Yr and participate in vacation occasions to persuade them that life within the Russian Federation is best than in Ukraine.[62] The Ukrainian Resistance Heart additionally reported on January 6 that Russian medical personnel escorted the youngsters from Horlivka, Donetsk Oblast, to take part in vacation occasions in Rostov Oblast, Russia.[63] Ukrainian Mariupol Mayoral Advisor Petro Andryushenko acknowledged on January 6 that safety guards wearing Donetsk Individuals’s Republic (DNR) police uniforms are persevering with to go looking the luggage of scholars in Mariupol faculties in a probable effort to grab objects associated to Ukrainian heritage.[64]
Russian occupation authorities continued to accentuate regulation enforcement measures in occupied territories on January 6. The Ukrainian Common Workers reported on January 6 that Russian occupation authorities intensified administrative and counterintelligence operations in Starobilsk, Luhansk Oblast, after profitable Ukrainian strikes in surrounding areas.[65] The Ukrainian Common Workers additionally reported on January 6 that Russian occupation authorities are checking the telephones of Starobilsk residents, paying explicit consideration to these with contacts who’re subscribed to Ukrainian telecommunications operators.[66]
Russian occupation authorities continued measures to regulate motion in occupied territories on January 6. Zaporizhia Oblast occupation official Vladimir Rogov acknowledged on January 6 that the occupation administration has begun to situation passes permitting autos to journey in occupied Zaporizhia Oblast.[67] Rogov acknowledged on January 6 that any resident in search of a move should go to a Russian navy commandant workplace in Melitopol, Berdyansk, Tokmak, or Vasylivka and supply passports and car paperwork.[68] Rogov acknowledged on January 6 that these passes will quickly be obligatory for unimpeded motion inside Zaporizhia Oblast.[69]
Russian occupation authorities are persevering with efforts to ban the circulation of the Ukrainian hryvnia from occupied territories. The Ukrainian Common Workers reported on January 6 that Russian occupation authorities are threatening to grab cash and items related to the hryvnia when raiding commerce homes in Kakhovka, Kherson Oblast.[70]
ISW will proceed to report each day noticed indicators in step with the present assessed most harmful plan of action (MDCOA): a renewed invasion of northern Ukraine presumably aimed toward Kyiv.
ISW’s December 15 MDCOA warning forecast a couple of potential Russian offensive in opposition to northern Ukraine in winter 2023 stays a worst-case state of affairs inside the forecast cone. ISW at the moment assesses the chance of a Russian invasion of Ukraine from Belarus as low, however doable, and the chance of Belarusian direct involvement as very low. This new part within the each day replace isn’t in itself a forecast or evaluation. It lays out the each day noticed indicators we’re utilizing to refine our assessments and forecasts, which we anticipate to replace often. Our evaluation that the MDCOA stays unlikely has not modified. We’ll replace this header if the evaluation adjustments.
Noticed indicators for the MDCOA up to now 24 hours:
- Nothing important to report.
Noticed ambiguous indicators for MDCOA up to now 24 hours:
- Russia deployed extra armored components to Belarus on January 6. The Belarusian Ministry of Protection (MoD) posted pictures on January 6 displaying that Russia deployed no less than one prepare with navy tools, together with armored personnel carriers and vans, to Baranovichi, Belarus.[71]The Belarusian MoD claims that these Russian components will conduct fight workouts with Belarusian forces as a part of the mixed Russian-Belarusian Regional Grouping of Forces (RGV). Unbiased Belarusian monitoring group the Hajun Mission reported that three trains with Russian tools arrived in Belarus on January 6.[72] One prepare reportedly arrived in Baranavichy from the Kantemirovka prepare station in Boguchar, Voronezh and two different trains arrived in Baranavichy and Slonim from unspecified areas in Russia. The Russian prepare from Boguchar could have transported components of the 1st Guards Tank Army that have been beforehand working in Luhansk Oblast. OSINT analysts on social media recognized possible components of the 15th Motorized Rifle Regiment of the twond Motorized Rifle Division of the 1st Guards Tank Army on the 230th Mixed Arms Obuz-Lesnovsky Coaching Floor in Brest, Belarus, on January 6.[73]
- Belarusian President Alexander Lukashenko paid an ostentatious go to to Russian and Belarusian troops on the 230th Mixed Arms Obuz-Lesnovsky Coaching Floor in Brest, Belarus, on January 6.[74] Lukashenko’s go to was possible a part of a standing Russian info operation designed to persuade Ukraine and the West that Russia will assault Ukraine from Belarus once more given he emphasised the Russian deployments.
- Deputy Belarusian Protection Minister Andrei Zhuk acknowledged on January 6 that the mixed Russian-Belarusian RGV is able to defend the Union State.[75] Zhuk acknowledged that one of many Belarusian and Russian goals is to have a unified tactical coaching for Russian and Belarusian forces.[76] Zhuk acknowledged that Russian and Belarusian components under the battalion degree will proceed coaching in summer time 2023 and that Russia and Belarus will conduct a joint command employees train to help the quadrennial Russian-Belarusian “Union Protect -2023” train.[77] Russian and Belarusian components could presumably train as mixed battalions or mixed platoons in these workouts.[78]
Noticed counter-indicators for the MDCOA up to now 24 hours:
- The Ukrainian Common Workers reiterated that it has not noticed Russian forces in Belarus forming a strike group as of January 6.[79]
Be aware: ISW doesn’t obtain any categorised materials from any supply, makes use of solely publicly accessible info, and attracts extensively on Russian, Ukrainian, and Western reporting and social media in addition to commercially accessible satellite tv for pc imagery and different geospatial information as the premise for these studies. References to all sources used are supplied within the endnotes of every replace.
View Citations
