July 18, 5:30 pm ET
Click on right here to see ISW’s interactive map of the Russian invasion of Ukraine. This map is up to date every day alongside the static maps current on this report.
Russian Protection Minister Sergey Shoigu’s July 18 assembly with the commander of the Jap group of forces Lieutenant Common Rustam Muradov helps ISW’s evaluation that Moscow is not going to prioritize an assault to grab Slovyansk on this stage of the operation however will as an alternative deal with seizing Siversk and Bakhmut.[1] The Russian Ministry of Protection (MoD) introduced on July 18 that Shoigu inspected the Jap group and directed Muradov to prioritize the destruction of Ukrainian long-range missiles and artillery programs. That is the primary time ISW has noticed express point out of the Jap power grouping working in Ukraine on this section of the conflict. The Russian MoD beforehand reported that the Central and Southern power teams took half within the seize of Luhansk Oblast underneath the management of Colonel Common Aleksandr Lapin and Army Common Sergey Surovikin.[2] The Jap group of forces is probably going comprised of parts of the Russian Jap Navy District (EMD), which have been lively alongside the Izyum axis in Kharkiv Oblast.[3] It’s nonetheless unclear whether or not Muradov additionally immediately controls operations round Kharkiv Metropolis. Muradov‘s forces are working within the Izyum-Slovyansk path ostensibly with the target of ultimately seizing Slovyansk itself, and it’s noteworthy that Shoigu didn’t direct Muradov to prioritize taking floor alongside this axis at the moment. Muradov holds a decrease rank than each Lapin and Surovikin, suggesting that the Kremlin considers the Izyum-Slovyansk space to be a decrease precedence than capturing territory in Donetsk Oblast as a part of the broader Donbas marketing campaign. The Kremlin doubtless is focusing army assets and high-rank management on localized and discrete positive aspects round Siversk and Bakhmut, regardless of Shoigu’s earlier requires the intensification of operations alongside all axes of advance.[4]
Russian President Vladimir Putin’s doubtless effort to protect ethnic Russians from excessive ranges of mobilization might set off resistance in a few of the ethnic enclaves that appear to be disproportionately bearing the burden of conflict. Russian Telegram channel Rybar launched a report on July 18 in regards to the Novaya Tuva movement- an anti-war group comprised of activists from the Tuvan ethnic minority enclave.[5] Rybar accused the Novaya Tuva motion of disseminating anti-war propaganda and inciting ethnic discord throughout the Russian Federation. This report is noteworthy within the context of the current enhance within the formation of regionally-based volunteer battalions by means of Russia, a lot of which fall alongside distinct ethnic traces.[6] ISW and others have beforehand famous the prevalence of non-ethnic Russian battalions preventing in Ukraine, which embrace troops from Chechnya, South Ossetia, Tuva, Tartarstan, Bashkortostan, Chuvashia, and others.[7] These indicators recommend that Putin could also be unwilling to conduct common mobilization partly as a result of a reluctance to mobilize massive numbers of ethnic Russians. Rybar’s submit in addition to earlier reporting on a ”Free Buryatia” anti-war group convey to the fore the danger that Putin’s obvious need to have non-Russians bear the brunt of the conflict at this stage might create home rigidity in these areas.
Key Takeaways
- The Russian Ministry of Protection’s assembly with the management of the Jap grouping of forces in Ukraine means that the Kremlin is not going to deal with seizing Slovyansk at this stage of the marketing campaign however will as an alternative prioritize trying to grab Siversk and Bakhmut.
- Russian President Vladimir Putin’s doubtless effort to place the burden of supporting operations in Ukraine on ethnic minorities to keep away from conducting a common mobilization of ethnic Russians could also be sparking resistance in ethnic enclaves in Russia.
- Russian forces performed a sequence of floor assaults east of Siversk and south of Bakhmut.
- Russian forces intensified efforts to advance on Avdiivka and performed restricted floor assaults alongside the Donetsk Metropolis-Avdiivka frontline.
- Russian authorities are persevering with to combine occupied areas into the Russian commerce financial system.
We don’t report intimately on Russian conflict crimes as a result of these actions are well-covered in Western media and don’t immediately have an effect on the army operations we’re assessing and forecasting. We are going to proceed to judge and report on the consequences of those legal actions on the Ukrainian army and inhabitants and particularly on fight in Ukrainian city areas. We totally condemn these Russian violations of the legal guidelines of armed battle, Geneva Conventions, and humanity despite the fact that we don’t describe them in these stories.
- Essential Effort—Jap Ukraine (comprised of 1 subordinate and three supporting efforts);
- Subordinate Essential Effort—Encirclement of Ukrainian Troops within the Cauldron between Izyum and Donetsk and Luhansk Oblasts
- Supporting Effort 1—Kharkiv Metropolis
- Supporting Effort 2—Southern Axis
- Mobilization and Drive Era Efforts
- Actions in Russian-occupied Areas
Essential Effort—Jap Ukraine
Subordinate Essential Effort—Southern Kharkiv, Donetsk, Luhansk Oblasts (Russian goal: Encircle Ukrainian forces in Jap Ukraine and seize the whole thing of Donetsk and Luhansk oblasts, the claimed territory of Russia’s proxies in Donbas)
Russian forces continued to conduct air and artillery strikes to the northwest of Slovyansk and could also be getting ready to renew offensive operations southwest of Izyum in the direction of Barvinkove on July 18.[8] The Ukrainian Common Employees reported that Russian forces tried and didn’t advance round Brazhivka and Dmytrivka-both 20km northeast of Barvinkove alongside the T2122 freeway.[9] Russian forces moreover performed artillery strikes round Barvinkove within the areas of Karnaukhivka and Virnopillya.[10] As ISW has beforehand assessed, Russian forces could also be trying to set circumstances for advances southwest of Izyum to enrich advances in the direction of Slovyansk from the southeast of Izyum or to open a brand new advance in the direction of Kramatorsk, though Russian troops are unlikely to efficiently advance on Kramatorsk from Barvinkove because of the sophisticated cross-country terrain on this space. Russian forces additionally continued strikes immediately on Slovyansk and on settlements to the east of Slovyansk, together with Tetyanivka, Donetske, and Starodubivka.[11]
Russian forces performed a sequence of unsuccessful floor assaults to the east of Siversk on July 18. The Ukrainian Common Employees acknowledged that Ukrainian troops repelled Russian makes an attempt to enhance their tactical positions within the instructions of Bilohorivka-Hryhorivka, Zolotarivka-Verkhnokamyanske, Zolotarivka-Serebryanka, and Verkhnokamyanka-Verkhnokamyanske.[12] Russian forces additionally performed restricted floor assaults close to Spirne, about 10km southeast of Siversk and continued to strike Ukrainian positions round Siversk.[13]
Russian forces continued localized floor assaults south of Bakhmut on July 18. The Ukrainian Common Employees famous that Russian forces unsuccessfully tried to advance alongside the Myronivka-Vuhledar Energy Plant line, about 20km southeast of Bakhmut.[14] Russian forces performed further restricted assaults in Novoluhanske and Semihirya, additionally south of Bakhmut, however didn’t make any confirmed advances.[15] Russian forces continued artillery, missile, and airstrikes round Bakhmut and struck Pokrovske, Vesela Dolyna, Kurdyumivka, Travneve, Shumy, and Soledar.[16]
Russian forces intensified floor assaults in the direction of Avdiivka on July 18.[17] The Ukrainian Common Employees reported that Russian troops tried to enhance their tactical place round Verkhnotoretske and Kamyanka, each to the northeast of Avdiivka. Donetsk Folks’s Republic (DNR) consultant Eduard Basurin claimed that DNR forces have fully blocked the street from Avdiivka to Konstyantynivka (north of Avdiivka) and have surrounded Avdiivka in a semicircle.[18] Former Russian militant commander and Russian nationalist miblogger Igor Girkin famous that regardless of current claims of success round Avdiivka, DNR items on this space are severely degraded and unlikely to make substantial positive aspects underneath the specter of heavy Ukrainian artillery hearth.[19]
Supporting Effort #1—Kharkiv Metropolis (Russian goal: Defend floor traces of communication (GLOCs) to Izyum and stop Ukrainian forces from reaching the Russian border)
Russian forces targeted on stopping Ukrainian forces from advancing to the Russian border in Kharkiv Oblast on July 18.[20] The Ukrainian Common Employees reported that Russian forces continued to hold out air, artillery, and missile strikes on civilian and army infrastructure in Kharkiv Metropolis and settlements to the north, northeast, east, and southeast.[21] Russian Telegram channel Rybar claimed that Russian forces focused on placing Ukrainian positions in Chuhuiv on July 17-18.[22]The Ukrainian Essential Navy Directorate (GUR) reported that the “Cedar” (“Кедр”) Ukrainian GUR Reconnaissance unit performed a particular operation in Dementiivka, north of Kharkiv Metropolis on July 18.[23] The GUR acknowledged that Ukrainian forces performed a restricted, localized counteroffensive that pushed “a big unit” of Russian forces out of Dementiivka.[24]
Supporting Effort #2—Southern Axis (Russian goal: Defend Kherson and Zaporizhia Oblasts towards Ukrainian counterattacks)
Russian forces targeted on sustaining occupied traces and stopping a Ukrainian offensive alongside the Southern Axis on July 18.[25] Russian forces performed airstrikes on Ukrainian positions alongside the Kherson-Mykolaiv and Kherson-Dnipropetrovsk Oblast borders and settlements on the Zaporizhia Oblast frontline.[26] The Ukrainian Common Employees reported that Ukrainian and Russian forces performed mutual shelling strikes alongside the contact line alongside the Southern Axis.[27] Kherson Oblast officers reported that Russian forces continued altering their focus areas to densely populated areas in Kherson Oblast in an effort to discourage Ukrainian strikes on Russian positions.[28]
Russian Telegram channel Rybar claimed on July 18 that Ukrainian forces are growing groupings of forces and gear close to the contact line within the Mykolaiv-Kryvyi Rih path in preparation for an offensive on Kherson Oblast.[29] Rybar additionally claimed that Ukrainian forces arrange a pontoon bridge in preparation for a doable offensive throughout the Inhulets River close to Arhanhelske, Kherson Oblast.[30]
Mobilization and Drive Era Efforts (Russian goal: Broaden fight energy with out conducting common mobilization)
Nothing important to report.
Exercise in Russian-occupied Areas (Russian goal: consolidate administrative management of occupied areas; set circumstances for potential annexation into the Russian Federation or another future political association of Moscow’s selecting)
Russian occupation authorities continued efforts to facilitate the financial integration of occupied areas into the Russian commerce financial system. The Ukrainian Resistance Middle reported that Russian authorities are “nationalizing” grain shops in occupied Zaporizhia Oblast underneath a unified Russian-owned “State Grain Firm.”[31] The report notes that Russian authorities are exporting as much as 100,000 tons of stolen Ukrainian grain from Zaporizhia Oblast to Egypt, Turkey, and unspecified Center Jap nations. Leveraging grain exports will enable Russian authorities to tie Ukrainian merchandise immediately into their world commerce networks.
View Citations
